Subgroup
Let \(G\) be a group. The subset \(H\) of \(G\) is a subgroup of \(G\) if \(H\) is nonempty and \(H\) is closed under products and inverses. (i.e., \(x,y \in H \implies x^{-1} \in H \land xy \in H\)). If \(H\) is a subgroup of \(G\), we write \(H \leq G\).
Proposition 1. The Subgroup Criterion
A subset \(H\) of a group \(G\) is a subgroup if and only if \(H \ne \emptyset\) and \(\forall x,y \in H, xy^{-1} \in H\).
Proof
Suppose \(H\) is a subgroup of \(G\). Then, by definition of subgroup, \(H \ne \emptyset\). Since \(H\) is closed under products and inverses, \(y \in H \implies y^{-1} \in H\) and \(x,y\in H \implies xy^{-1} \in H\).
Conversely, suppose \(H \ne \emptyset\) and \(\forall x,y \in H, xy^{-1} \in H\).
\(1 \in H\) because for any \(x \in H\), \(xx^{-1} = 1 \in H\). Therefore, for any \(x \in H\), \(1x^{-1} = x^{-1} \in H\), so \(H\) is closed under inverses. Since \(H\) is closed under inverses, $$ x,y \in H \implies x,y^{-1} \in H \implies x(y^{-1})^{-1} = xy \in H $$ and thus it’s also closed under products.
Therefore, by definition of subgroup, \(H\) is a subgroup.
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Centralizer
Let \(A\) be a nonempty subset of \(G\). \(C_G(A) = \{g \in G \mid gag^{-1} = a \text{ for all } a \in A\}\) is a subset of \(G\) and called the centralizer of \(A\) in \(G\). Since \(gag^{-1} = a\) if and only if \(ga = ag\), \(C_G(A)\) is the set of elements of \(G\) which commute with every element of \(A\).
\(C_G(A)\) is a subgroup of \(G\)
Proof
\(1 \in C_G(A)\), so \(C_G(A) \ne \emptyset\). Note $$ x \in C_G(A) \implies xax^{-1} = a \text { for all } a \in A $$ and $$ y \in C_G(A) \implies yay^{-1} = a \text { for all } a \in A \implies a = y^{-1}ay\ \text{ for all } a \in A. $$
Also note that \((xy^{-1})(yx^{-1}) = 1\) and thus \((xy^{-1})^{-1} = yx^{-1}\).
Consequently, for any \(a \in A\),
$$ x,y \in C_G(A) \implies (xy^{-1})a(xy^{-1})^{-1} = xy^{-1}ayx^{-1} = a \implies xy^{-1} \in C_G(A). $$
Therefore, by The Subgroup Criterion, \(C_G(A)\) is a subgroup of \(G\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Center
Define \(Z(G) = \{g \in G \mid gx = xg \text{ for all } x \in G\}\), the set of elements commuting with all the elements of \(G\). This subset of \(G\) is called the center of \(G\).
Note \(Z(G) = C_G(G)\).
\(Z(G)\) is a subgroup of \(G\)
Proof
Note \(Z(G) = C_G(G)\). We already showed that \(C_G(A)\) in general is a subgroup of \(G\). $$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Normalizer
Define \(gAg^{-1} = \{gag^{-1} \mid a \in A\}\). The normalizer of \(A\) in \(G\) is the set $$N_G(A) = \{g \in G \mid gAg^{-1} = A\}$$
Note \(C_G(A) \le N_G(A)\).
\(N_G(A)\) is a subgroup of \(G\)
Proof
\(N_G(A) \ne \emptyset\) because \(1 \in C_G(A) \le N_G(A)\). Now it remains to show \(x,y \in N_G(A) \implies xy^{-1} \in N_G(A)\).
Suppose \(x,y \in N_G(A)\). Then \(\{yay^{-1} \mid a \in A\} = A\). In other words, \(\varphi: A \rightarrow A\) defined by \(\varphi(a) = yay^{-1}\) is a bijection because the the map is surjective and the cardinality of the domain is equal to that of the codomain. Notice \(\psi: A \rightarrow A\) defined by \(\psi(a) = y^{-1}ay\) is the inverse of \(\varphi\) because for any \(a \in A\),
$$ \varphi\psi(a) = \varphi(y^{-1}ay) = y(y^{-1}ay)y^{-1} = a. $$
Therefore, \(\psi\) is also a bijection and \(\{y^{-1}ay \mid a \in A\} = A\). Thus, \(y^{-1} \in N_G(A)\).
Also note that \((xy^{-1})(yx^{-1}) = 1\) and thus \((xy^{-1})^{-1} = yx^{-1}\). Consequently,
$$ (xy^{-1})A(xy^{-1})^{-1} = xy^{-1}Ayx^{-1}\\ = \{x(y^{-1}ay)x^{-1} \mid a \in A\} = \{xa_yx^{-1} \mid a_y \in A\} = \{a_x \mid a_x \in A\} = A. $$
Therefore, \(xy^{-1} \in N_G(A)\). By The Subgroup Criterion, \(N_G(A)\) is a subgroup of \(G\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Stabilizer
Let \(G\) be a group acting on a set \(S\), and let \(s\) be some fixed element of \(S\). The stabilizer of \(s\) in \(G\) is the set $$ G_s = \{g \in G \mid g \cdot s = s\} $$
\(G_s\) is a subgroup of \(G\)
Proof
By definition of \(G_s\), \(G_s\) is a subset of \(G\). Suppose \(y\in G_s\). Then, it follows from the definition of group action and \(y \cdot s = s\) that $$ y^{-1}\cdot s = y^{-1} \cdot (y \cdot s) = (y^{-1}y)\cdot s = 1 \cdot s = s. $$
Further suppose that \(x \in G_s\). Then, $$ xy \cdot s = xy\cdot (y^{-1} \cdot s) = (xyy^{-1})\cdot s = x \cdot s = s. $$
Therefore, \(G_s\) is closed under products and inverses. By definition of subgroup, \(G_s\) is a subgroup of \(G\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Kernel
The kernel of an action of \(G\) on \(S\) is defined as \(\{g \in G \mid g\cdot s = s \text{ for all } s \in S\}\).
The kernel of an action is a subgroup
Proof
Let \(K\) be the kernel. By its definition, \(K\) is a subset of \(G\). Suppose \(y \in K\). Then \(y \cdot s = s\) for all \(s \in S\). It follows that, for an arbitrary \(s \in S\), $$ y^{-1} \cdot s = y^{-1}\cdot (y\cdot s) = (y^{-1}y)\cdot s = 1 \cdot s = s. $$
Further suppose that \(x \in K\). Then, $$ xy\cdot s = xy\cdot(y^{-1}\cdot s) = (xyy^{-1})\cdot s = x \cdot s = s. $$
Therefore, \(K\) is closed under products and inverses. By definition of subgroup, \(K\) is a subgroup of \(G\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Cyclic Group
A group \(H\) is cyclic if there is some element \(x \in H\) such that \(H = \{x^n \mid n\in\mathbb{Z}\}\). We write \(H = \langle x \rangle\) and say \(H\) is generated by \(x\), and \(x\) is a generator of \(H\).
Proposition 2
Let \(H = \langle x \rangle\).
- if \(|H| = n \lt \infty \), then \(x^n = 1\) and \(1,x,x^2,…x^{n-1}\) are all distinct elements of \(H\)
- if \(|H| = \infty \), then \(x^n \ne 1\) for all \(n \ne 0\) and \(x^a \ne x^b\) for all \(a \ne b\) in \(\mathbb{Z}\).
Proof
For the first part, suppose \(|H| = n\) and let \(k\) be the order of \(x\).
Using the Division Algorithm, any \(i \in \mathbb{Z}\) can be written as \(i = kq + r\). Therefore, for an arbitrary \(i \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(x^i = x^{kq + r} = x^{kq}x^r = 1^qx^r = x^r\). Since \(r \in [0, k-1]\), \(H = \{1, x, x^2,…,x^{k - 1}\}\).
Let \(0 \le a \le b \lt k\). Then \(x^a = x^b \implies 1 = x^{b-a}\). Since identity is unique in a group and we know that one identity \(x^0 = 1\) exists already, \(a\) must equal \(b\). Therefore, \(a \ne b \implies x^a \ne x^b\).
It follows that all the elements in \(H = \{1,x,x^2,…,x^{k-1}\}\) shown above are distinct. Since it’s given that \(|H| = n\), \(k = n\). Hence, \(x^n = 1\) and \(1,x,x^2,…,x^{n-1}\) are all distinct elements of \(H\).
For the second part, suppose \(|H| = \infty\).
Suppose for a contradiction that \(x^n = 1\) for some \(n \ne 0\). Then, using the Division Algorithm, for any \(i \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(x^i = x^{nq+r} = x^{nq}x^r = x^r\). Since \(r \in [0, n-1]\), \(H = \{1,x,x^2,…,x^{n-1}\}\), contradicting the fact that \(|H| = \infty\). Therefore, \(x^n \ne 1\) for all \(n \ne 0\).
Suppose for a contradiction that \(x^a = x^b\) for some \(a \ne b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Then \(1 = x^{b-a}\). Because of the uniqueness of identity, \(a = b\), contradicting our assumption. Therefore, \(x^a \ne x^b\) for all \(a \ne b\) in \(\mathbb{Z}\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Proposition 3
Let \(G\) be a group, \(x \in G\), and \(m, n \in \mathbb{Z}\). If \(x^n = 1\) and \(x^m = 1\), then \(x^d = 1\), where \(d = \gcd(m,n)\). In particular, if \(x^m = 1\) for some \(m \in \mathbb{Z}\), then \(|x| \mid m\).
Proof
By the Euclidean Algorithm, there exist \(r, s \in \mathbb{Z}\) such that \(d = mr + ns\). Therefore, $$ x^d = x^{mr + ns} = x^{mr}x^{ns} = 1^r1^s = 1. $$
For the second part, let \(x^m = 1\) for some \(m \in \mathbb{Z}\) and let \(n = |x|\). Then since \(x^m = x^n = 1\), using what we’ve just shown, \(x^d = 1\) where \(d = \gcd(m, n)\). Note that \(0 \lt d \le n\) and that, by definition of order, \(n\) is the smallest positive power of \(x\) to give the identity. Therefore, \(n = d = \gcd(m,n)\), and thus \(n \mid m\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Theorem 4
- If \(\langle x \rangle\) and \(\langle y \rangle\) are both cyclic groups of order \(n\), the map \(\varphi: \langle x \rangle \rightarrow \langle y \rangle\) defined by \(x^k \mapsto y^k\) is well defined and is an isomorphism.
- If \(\langle x \rangle\) is an infinite cyclic group, the map \(\varphi: \mathbb{Z} \rightarrow \langle x \rangle\) defined by \(k \mapsto x^k\) is well defined and is an isomorphism.
Proof
To show that the map is well defined, we need to show that \(s = t \implies \varphi(s) = \varphi(t)\).
(1)
Suppose \(x^a = x^b\). Since \(x^{a-b} = 1\), as shown earlier, \(n \mid a-b\). Then we can write \(a-b = tn\) or \(a = tn + b\) for some \(t\). It follows that \(\varphi(x^a) = y^a = y^{tn+b} = y^{tn}y^b = y^b = \varphi(x^b)\). Therefore, \(\varphi\) is well defined.
For arbitrary \(i,j \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(\varphi(x^i)\varphi(x^j) = y^iy^j = y^{i+j} = \varphi(x^{i+j}) = \varphi(x^ix^j)\). Thus, \(\varphi\) is a homomorphism.
For any \(y^k \in \langle y \rangle\), \(\varphi(x^k) = y^k\). Therefore, \(\varphi\) is surjective. As shown earler, \(|\langle g \rangle| = |g|\) for any finite cyclic group \(\langle g \rangle\). Therefore, \(|\langle x \rangle| = |\langle y \rangle| = n\) and thus \(\varphi\) is a bijection.
Since \(\varphi\) is both a homomorphism and a bijection, it’s an isomorphism.
(2)
\(a = b \implies \varphi(a) = x^a = x^b = \varphi(b)\). Therefore, \(\varphi\) is well defined.
Note \(\mathbb{Z}\) is a group under addition. For arbitrary \(i,j \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(\varphi(i)\varphi(j) = x^ix^j = x^{i+j} = \varphi(i+j)\). Therefore, \(\varphi\) is a homomorphism.
For any \(x^k \in \langle x \rangle\), \(\varphi(k) = x^k\), so \(\varphi\) is surjective. We’ve shown above that if \(\langle x \rangle\) is an infinite group, then \(x^a \ne x^b\) for all \(a \ne b \in \mathbb{Z}\). Therefore, \(\varphi\) is injective.
Since \(\varphi\) is both a homomorphism and a bijection, it’s an isomorphism.
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Proposition 5
Let \(G\) be a group, \(x \in G\), and \(a \in \mathbb{Z} - \{0\}\).
- If \(|x| = \infty\), then \(|x^a| = \infty\).
- If \(|x| = n < \infty\), then \(|x^a| = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,a)}\).
- In particular, if \(|x| = n < \infty\) and \(a\) is a positive integer dividing \(n\), then \(|x^a| = \frac{n}{a}\).
Proof
(1)
Suppose \(|x^a| = n < \infty\). Then \((x^a)^n = x^{an} = 1\). Also, \(x^{-an} = (x^{an})^{-1} = 1^{-1} = 1\). By definition of order, \(n \ne 0\), and \(a \ne 0\) as given. Therefore, either \(an\) or \(-an\) is positive. Thefore, \(|x| \ne \infty\).
That is, \(|x^a| \ne \infty \implies |x| \ne \infty\). Equivalently, \(|x| = \infty \implies |x^a| = \infty\).
(2)
Let \(d = \gcd(n,a)\). Then we can write \(n = db\) and \(a = dc\) for some \(b,c \in \mathbb{Z}\) where \(b\) and \(c\) are relatively prime and \(b > 0\). We want to show that \(|x^a| = b\).
Let \(k = |x^a|\). Then \(1 = (x^a)^k = x^{ak}\), and thus, as shown earlier, \(n \mid ak\). Equivalently, \(db \mid dck\), or \(b \mid ck\). Since \(b\) and \(c\) are relatively prime, \(b \mid k\).
Also, \((x^a)^b = x^{ab} = x^{dcb} = x^{nc} = (x^n)^c = 1^c = 1\), and thus \(k \mid b\).
We just showed that \(k\) and \(b\) are positive integers that divide each other. Therefore, \(k = b\), or \(|x^a| = b\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
(3)
TODO
Proposition 6
Let \(H = \langle x \rangle\).
- Assume \(|x| = \infty\). Then \(H = \langle x^a \rangle\) if and only if \(a = \pm1\).
- Assume \(|x| = n < \infty\). Then \(H = \langle x^a \rangle\) if and only if \(\gcd(a,n) = 1\).
Proof
(1)
Suppose \(H = \langle x \rangle = \langle x^a \rangle\). Since \(x \in \langle x \rangle\), \(x \in \langle x^a \rangle\) too. Therefore, there exists some \(k \in \mathbb{Z}\) such that \(x = (x^a)^k = x^{ak}\). Then \(1 = x^{ak-1}\). Since \(|x| = \infty\), \(|H| = \infty\), and as shown earlier, \(x^s \ne x^t\) for all \(s \ne t \in \mathbb{Z}\). Therefore, \(ak-1\) must be \(0\). Since \(a,k \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(a = \pm 1\).
Conversely, suppose \(a = \pm 1\). If \(a = 1\), \(\langle x^a \rangle = \langle x^1 \rangle = \langle x \rangle\). Now suppose \(a = -1\). Then for any element \(x^i \in \langle x \rangle\), \(x^i = (x^{-1})^{-i} = (x^a)^{-i} \in \langle x^a \rangle\). Similarly, for any element \((x^a)^i \in \langle x^a \rangle\), \((x^a)^i = x^{-i} \in \langle x \rangle\). Therefore, \(\langle x \rangle = \langle x^a \rangle\).
(2)
\(\langle x^a \rangle\) is a finite subgroup of \(\langle x \rangle\). We showed earlier that \(|x^a| = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,a)}\) where \(n = |x|\). Thus, \(\langle x \rangle = \langle x^a \rangle\) iff \(|\langle x \rangle| = |\langle x^a \rangle|\) iff \(n = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,a)}\) iff \(\gcd(n,a) = 1\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Theorem 7.1
Let \(H = \langle x \rangle\) be a cyclic group. If \(K \le H\), then either \(K = \{1\}\) or \(K = \langle x^d \rangle\), where \(d\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(x^d \in K\).
Proof
Suppose \(K \le H\). \(\{1\} \le H\), so \(K\) can be \(\{1\}\).
Now consider the case where \(K \ne \{1\}\). Note all non-identity elements of \(K\) can be expressed as a nonzero power of \(x\). In particular, there is at least one element \(x^k\) in \(K\) for a nonzero integer \(k\). Since \(x^k \in K \implies x^{-k} \in K\), there is at least one positive power of \(x\) and one negative power of \(x\) in \(K\).
Let \(d\) be the smallest positive integer such that \(x^d \in K\). Then, because \(K\) is a group and thus closed, \((x^d)^n \in K\) for all \(n \in \mathbb{Z}\). Therefore, \(\langle x^d \rangle \le K\).
Suppose for a contradiction that there exists \(j\) such that \(x^j \in K \land x^j \notin \langle x^d \rangle\). As argued above, we can assume \(j > 0\) without loss of generality. Furthermore, by definition of \(d\), \(j > d\). Since \(x^j \notin \langle x^d \rangle\), \(j\) is not a multiple of \(d\). Therefore, using the Division Algorithm, we can write \(j = qd + r\) where \(q > 0\) and \(d > r > 0\). Since \(x^{qd} = (x^d)^q \in K\), its inverse is also in \(K\). It follows that \(x^j \in K \implies x^{qd+r} \in K = x^{qd}x^r \in K \implies x^r \in K\).
However, this contradicts the fact that \(d\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(x^d \in K\). Therefore, there is no \(j\) such that \(x^j \in K \land x^j \notin \langle x^d \rangle\). Hence, \(K \le \langle x^d \rangle\).
Since \(\langle x^d \rangle \le K\) and \(K \le \langle x^d \rangle\), \(K = \langle x^d \rangle\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Theorem 7.2
Let \(H = \langle x \rangle\) be a cyclic group. If \(|H| = \infty\), then for any distinct nonnegative integers \(a\) and \(b\), \(\langle x^a \rangle \ne \langle x^b \rangle\). Furthermore, for every \(m \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(\langle x^m \rangle = \langle x^{|m|} \rangle\), where \(|m|\) denotes the absolute value of \(m\), so that the nontrivial subgroups of \(H\) correspond bijectively with the integers \(1,2,3…\).
Proof
Suppose \(a = 0\) and \(b \ne 0\). Then \(\langle x^a \rangle = \{1\}\), and \(\langle x^b \rangle \ne \{1\}\). Therefore, \(\langle x^a \rangle \ne \langle x^b \rangle\). The same logic applies when \(a \ne 0\) and \(b = 0\).
Now assume \(a\) and \(b\) are both nonzero. Since \(\langle x^a \rangle\) is a subgroup of \(H\), as shown previously, we can let \(\langle x^a \rangle = \langle x^\alpha \rangle\) where \(\alpha\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(x^\alpha \in \langle x^a \rangle\). Likewise, let \(\langle x^b \rangle = \langle x^\beta \rangle\) where \(\beta\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(x^\beta \in \langle x^b \rangle\).
Without loss of generality, assume \(\alpha < \beta\). Suppose for a contradiction that \(\langle x^a \rangle = \langle x^b \rangle\). Then \(x^\alpha \in \langle x^b \rangle\). Since \(\alpha < \beta\), this contradicts the fact that \(\beta\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(x^\beta \in \langle x^b \rangle\). Therefore, \(\langle x^a \rangle \ne \langle x^b \rangle\).
The second assertion is trivially true if \(m \ge 0\), so assume \(m < 0\). We want to show that \(\langle x^m \rangle = \langle x^{-m} \rangle\).
For any \((x^m)^k \in \langle x^m \rangle\), \((x^m)^k = (x^{-m})^{-k} \in \langle x^{-m} \rangle\). Conversely, for any \((x^{-m})^k \in \langle x^{-m} \rangle\), \((x^{-m})^k = (x^m)^{-k} \in \langle x^m \rangle\). Therefore, \(\langle x^m \rangle = \langle x^{-m} \rangle\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$
Theorem 7.3
Let \(H = \langle x \rangle\) be a cyclic group. If \(|H| = n < \infty\), then for each positive integer \(a\) dividing \(n\) there is a unique subgroup of \(H\) of order \(a\). This subgroup is the cyclic group \(\langle x^d \rangle\) where \(d = {\frac{n}{a}}\). Furthermore, for every \(m \in \mathbb{Z}\), \(\langle x^m \rangle = \langle x^{\gcd(n,m)} \rangle\), so that the subgroups of \(H\) correspond bijectively with the positive divisors of \(n\).
Proof
Let \(a \mid n\) and \(n = ad\). Then \(d = \frac{n}{a}\) and \(a = \frac{n}{d}\). By Proposition 5, $$ |x| = n \implies |x^a| = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,a)} $$
Applying this, we have \(|x^d| = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,d)} = \frac{n}{d} = a\). Therefore, \(\langle x^d \rangle\) is a subgroup of \(H\) of order \(a\).
To show uniqueness, suppose \(K\) is any subgroup of order \(a\). Then we can let \(K = \langle x^b \rangle\) where \(b\) is the smallest positive integer such that \(x^b \in K\). Then, again using Proposition 5,
$$ \frac{n}{d} = a = |K| = |\langle x^b \rangle| = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,b)} $$
Therefore, \(d = \gcd(n,b)\) and in particular, \(d \mid b\). Since \(b\) is a multiple of \(d\), \(x^b \in \langle x^d \rangle\). That is, \(K = \langle x^b \rangle \le \langle x^d \rangle\). Since \(|\langle x^b \rangle| = |\langle x^d \rangle| = a\), \(K = \langle x^b \rangle = \langle x^d \rangle\).
Now consider the second assertion. Since \(\gcd(n,m) \mid m\), any \(x^{mk} \in \langle x^m \rangle\) also belongs to \(\langle x^{\gcd(n,m)} \rangle\). Therefore, \(\langle x^m \rangle \le \langle x^{\gcd(n,m)} \rangle\). Note, using Proposition 5 again,
$$ |\langle x^m \rangle| = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,m)} = \frac{n}{\gcd(n,\gcd(n,m))} = |\langle x^{\gcd(n,m)} \rangle|. $$
Therefore, \(\langle x^m \rangle = \langle x^{\gcd(n,m)} \rangle\).
$$\tag*{$\blacksquare$}$$